In Re the Request of Lafayette Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant City of South St. Paul asserts its prerogative to decide whether a roadway should be' used and maintained and challenges the trial court’s order granting a writ of mandamus to compel the city to acknowledge that a partially improved end of a street is open to public use. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Lafayette Development Corp. owns a 28-acre parcel of land that is located mostly in the City of Inver Grove Heights but borders the southern city limits of South St. Paul. The tract abuts two platted South St. Paul neighborhoods that are separated by a dedicated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Johnson v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Flynn v. BeiselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- North Dakota v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020