Legal Opinion
In RE: The APPEAL FROM the FINAL ORDER OF the BOARD OF MANAGERS OF the BOIS DE SIOUX WATERSHED DISTRICT REDETERMINING BENEFITS AND DAMAGES FOR J.D. NO. 14 DATED 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 and in Re: The Appeal From the Final Order of the Board of Managers of the Bois De Sioux Watershed District Assessing Costs and Expenses of Redetermination Associated With the Redetermination of Benefits of J.D. No. 14 Dated the 27th Day of March, 2014 and in Re the Appeal From the Final Order of the Board of Managers of the Bois De Sioux Watershed District Assessing Costs and Expenses of Redetermination Associated With the Redetermination of Benefits of J.D. No. 14 Dated the 18th Day of December, 2014
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 19, 2016No. A16-488PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIÓN
SCHELLHAS, Judge
Landowners appeal the summary-judgment dismissal of their claims challenging the Bois de Sioux Watershed District’s redetermination of benefits and damages for Judicial Ditch No. 14 and assessment of redetermination costs and expenses against the drainage system. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Judicial Ditch No. 14 (JD 14) is a public drainage system assessed as benefiting or damaging 29,479.6 acres of land within Grant and Traverse Counties. The drainage system was established by court order in 1950 and was constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017