Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell,Justice:
Appellant Fine Liquors appeals from the master-in-equity’s decision upholding the validity of a Town of Hilton Head (Town) ordinance which prohibits the use of internally illuminated signs which are visible from any public right of way or beach. The issues involved are: whether the ordinance conflicts with statutory provisions; whether the ordinance was a reasonable exercise of the Town’s police power; and whether the ordinance is constitutional under the equal protection clause. We affirm the order of the master-in-equity.
The Town seeks to enjoin Fine Liquors from using four…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Robinson v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Doe v. American Red Cross Blood ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina, Inc. v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Denene, Inc. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Municipal Ass'n v. AT & T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Quality Towing, Inc. v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.