Legal Opinion

Doe v. American Red Cross Blood Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 1989No. 22977PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 46, we agreed to answer four questions certified by the Honorable Clyde H. Hamilton, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The questions presented to this court by Judge Hamilton are as follows:(1) Does South Carolina recognize a separate standard of care for professionals under which generally recognized and accepted practices in the profession constitute the standard of care owed by a member of that profession?(2) If South Carolina recognizes a “professional negligence standard,” would it apply to blood banks such as the Red…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Hines v. St. Joseph's HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Kozup v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  5. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Williams v. KushnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Doe v. American National Red CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API