Legal Opinion
In Re Howard, Neilsen & Rush, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 27, 1979No. Bankruptcy 77-31463PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL E. JENNINGS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Alleged bankrupt Howard, Neilsen & Rush, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as HNR) moves the court to amend its judgment entered on January 30,1979, to award HNR its costs and reasonable counsel fees pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 115(e).
This court dismissed the involuntary petition filed against HNR by Reliance Insurance Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as RELIANCE) after making extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. HNR is therefore the “prevailing party” within the meaning of Bankruptcy Rule 115(e).
Initially, this court holds…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation. In Re Boston & Providence Railroad Development GroupCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- In re GhiglioneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Camelot, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DJF Realty & Suppliers, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1986
- In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- In Re Johnston Hawks Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.