Legal Opinion

Dicker v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 15, 1974No. 47,422PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Foti-i, C.:

This is an action for actual and punitive damages for fraud in the sale of a home in Wichita. The plaintiff, Michael H. Dicker, alleged that the defendants fraudulently represented the house to be free from termites when he bought it. The defendants Benjamin and Yvonne Smith are the owner-sellers, and the defendant Edwin R. Clarke is the real estate broker who handled the sale.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case the trial court sustained a motion by the realtor, Clarke, for a directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages as to him.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Stoner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Cady v. CaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Walker v. Fleming Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Ottawa v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Kuhl v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. City of Shawnee, Kan. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  5. Traylor v. WachterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API