Legal Opinion
City of Shawnee, Kan. v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 22, 1995No. 94-2444-JWLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
The cities of Shawnee, Kansas (Shawnee) and Merriam, Kansas (Merriam) bring this action to determine the rights and obligations of AT & T 1 to construct, operate and main tain fiber optic telecommunications cables ■within each plaintiffs boundaries. Presently before the court is AT & T’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. #38). For the reasons stated below, the court makes the following rulings: (1) Merriam may not rescind its agreement with AT & T; (2) the ordinances passed by Merriam and Shawnee are invalid; (3) Merriam’s nuisance claim is barred…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Browning v. MCI, Inc. (In Re WorldCom, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Oxford v. Williams Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
- In Re WorldCom, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Worldcom, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Browning v. MCI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.