Legal Opinion
Cedar Rapids Engineering Co. v. Haenelt
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.
The defendant requests an order vacating or modifying an order of replevin. The plaintiff obtained the order incident to its action to recover certain chattels from the defendant. The venue of the action was fixed in the Supreme Court of Sullivan1 County. The order was signed by the County *207Judge of Sullivan County as an Acting Supreme Court Justice.2 The replevin order was obtained ex parte, i.e., the defendant was not notified of plaintiff’s application for the order of replevin.
The defendant’s motion to vacate or modify the order was returnable at a Special Term of the Supreme Court in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Laprease v. Raymours Furniture CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1970
- Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Housing & Development Administration v. Community Housing Improvement Program, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
- Cedar Rapids Engineering Co. v. HaeneltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Roscoe v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- Williams v. JP Morgan & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003