Laprease v. Raymours Furniture Company
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PORT, District Judge.
In the above-entitled actions, consolidated for hearing, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from enforcing Article 71 1 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules. That Article governs the procedure in a replevin action, and permits the prehearing seizure of the subject matter of the action without the intervention or order of a judicial officer.
Temporary restraining orders were issued in each case restraining the defendants from making seizures pursuant to the provisions of Article 71 2 and three-judge courts were designated and convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Santiago v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.