Legal Opinion

Laprease v. Raymours Furniture Company

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 29, 1970No. 70-CV-16, 70-CV-50PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORT, District Judge.

In the above-entitled actions, consolidated for hearing, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants from enforcing Article 71 1 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules. That Article governs the procedure in a replevin action, and permits the prehearing seizure of the subject matter of the action without the intervention or order of a judicial officer.

Temporary restraining orders were issued in each case restraining the defendants from making seizures pursuant to the provisions of Article 71 2 and three-judge courts were designated and convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Santiago v. McElroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API