Roscoe v. Butler
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, Chief District Judge.
The plaintiffs instituted these suits as class actions, each challenging the constitutionality of attachment upon original process after two summonses have been returned non est, as authorized by the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 9, Section 1(b) (Cum.Supp.1972) and Maryland District Court Rules G40 et seq., on the grounds that this procedure violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. The plaintiffs request this Court to enter declaratory judgments and to permanently enjoin the defendants from executing any writs of attachment issued…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Moody v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mississippi Chemical Corp. v. Chemical Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1977
- In Re Law Research Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Jonnet v. Dollar Savings Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Overmyer v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Phyllis J. Outlaw & Associates v. GrahamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006