Legal Opinion

In re GLG Life Tech Corp. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 9, 2012No. 11 Civ. 09150 (KBF) (GWG)PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs in this matter have filed a complaint alleging that the defendants — GLG Life Tech Corporation (“GLG”), Luke Zhang, and Brian R. Meadows — violated federal securities laws. The plaintiffs successfully served GLG and Meadows, both of whom have appeared by counsel and responded to the complaint. The plaintiffs now move for leave to serve Zhang by alternative means pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, this motion is granted.

1. BACKGROUND

Defendant Zhang is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Christopher J. Farrell v. Corey Burke and Gregory Freeman, Docket No. 05-0169 CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Jian Zhang v. Baidu.com Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Stream Sicav v. WangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Elsevier, Inc. v. Siew Yee ChewDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API