Legal Opinion

Stream Sicav v. Wang

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 7, 2013No. 12 Civ. 6682 (PAE)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

In this putative class action, lead plaintiff Stream SICAV and named plaintiffs Dharanendra Rai and Tien Chung (collectively “Stream SICAV” or “plaintiffs”) allege that defendants SmartHeat, Inc. (“SmartHeat”) and James Jun Wang violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s implementing rule, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (“Rule lOb-5”).1 Stream SICAV alleges that SmartHeat and Wang omitted to reveal information that rendered materially false…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. In re Petrobras Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Elsevier, Inc. v. Siew Yee ChewDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. ICP Strategic Credit Income Fund, Ltd. v. DLA Piper L.L.P. (In re ICP Strategic Credit Income Fund, Ltd.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API