Legal Opinion
Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. Nigeria
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2010No. 07 Civ. 11028(PKL)PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action for breach of contract. Plaintiffs, Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. (the “Madu Firm”) and John Edozie (“Edozie”) move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(f)(3), for court-ordered service of process on four defendants—SocketWorks Limited Nigeria (“SLN” or “SocketWorks”), Odrek Rwabwo-go (“Rwabwogo”), Prosper Adabla (“Adab-la”), and Aloy Chife (“Chife”). Plaintiffs ask the Court for an order permitting substitute service on these four defendants through the law firm, Steptoe & Johnson LLP (“Steptoe & Johnson”),…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- McLennon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- In re GLG Life Tech Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.