Legal Opinion

Lee v. Schultz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1985No. 14564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

The trial court’s application of the doctrine of res judicata resulted in the dismissal of appellants’ complaint, by which Ralph E. Lee and Carolyn B. Lee (Lees) sought abatement of a nuisance resulting from respondent Mark G. Schultz’ (Schultz) drainage of sloughs on his land onto the land of Lees. Schultz affirmatively pled res judicata based on an earlier adjudication, wherein Ralph Lee individually (Ralph) sought an injunction against maintenance of the drainage ditch, which relief was denied. Lees appeal and we reverse and remand.

*88The facts before the trial court, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Carr v. PreslarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Klaber v. LakenanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. White v. BainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. First Lady, LLC v. JMF PROPERTIES, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lee v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lee v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API