Legal Opinion

Carr v. Preslar

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1951No. File 9142PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The complaint of plaintiffs, Jay R. Carr and Louie Krogman, prays for a judgment declaring their right to 5% of the oil and gas royalty reserved in a lease of Texas land owned by defendant, Benjamin F. Preslar. On the ground that plaintiffs’ cause of action merged in a judgment entered in a previous action between the parties and is res judicata, the trial court entered judgment for defendant. The validity of that conclusion of law of the trial court is presented for decision by this appeal of the plaintiffs.

The facts which gave rise to the litigation between the parties are largely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. United Bank & Trust Co. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Jerome v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re R. Z. F.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People ex rel. L.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API