Legal Opinion

Lee v. Schultz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1988No. 15682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice (on reassignment).

Ralph and Carolyn Lee (Lees) appeal a verdict for Mark Schultz (Schultz) in Lees’ nuisance action for an injunction and damages. We reverse and remand.

Facts

Lees and Schultz farm adjoining tracts of land in Moody County, South Dakota. There are two sloughs on Schultz’ land — a small one consisting of nine acres and a large one consisting of thirty-two acres. The small slough drains naturally across a road and onto Lees’ land. Prior to 1981, the large slough was a land-locked basin with no natural outlet. In January of 1981, Schultz dug a nine-feet-deep ditch…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thompson v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Winterton v. ElversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lounsberry v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kremer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kremer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lee v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API