Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1995No. C92-10-35905; CA A83172PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after his probation was revoked. We remand for entry of a corrected judgment.

Defendant pleaded no contest to two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. The parties stipulated that the applicable gridblock was 6-B, which has a presumptive prison sentence of 19-24 months. The sentencing court found substantial and compelling reasons to impose a downward dispositional departure to probation on both convictions, and that consecutive sentences could be imposed under ORS 137.123. It imposed a sentence of two consecutive five-year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. GuytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. RusenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. LavitskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. RusenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API