Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. _ _ Suit in equity by the Walker Bin Company against the Cincinnati Butchers’ Supply Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
[1] Suit on Walker patent, No.. 614,279. We are strongly impressed that the claim of the patent is not ambiguous enough to permit it to be read so as not to cover the earlier Carr structure, unless we import into the claim a limitation contrary to the rule *454on that subject. We also appreciate the (at least) considerable force in the argument that defendant’s axis of oscillation is far enough back from the front edge of the casing so that defendant must have some of that waste clearance space, the avoidance of which was the paten-tee’s declared object in locating his axis as specified in his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Penfield v. C. & A. Potts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901
- Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Miller & EnglandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- Miller v. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Williams v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Novadel-Agene Corporation v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Hughes Tool Co. v. United MacH. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.