Legal Opinion
Novadel-Agene Corporation v. Penn
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1941No. 9826PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Circuit Judge.
Fredric H. Penn and Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Company were sued for infringement of two patents owned by Novadel-Agene Corporation. The patents in suit were No. 1,539,701 issued to Egbert Cornells Sutherland on May 26, 1925, and No. 1,555,805 issued to Thilo Kroeber on September 29, 1925.
The claims declared upon by Novadel-Agene Corporation were the following:
Sutherland, No. 1,539,701.
“5. A process for treating flour, meal or other cereal or analogous milling product, consisting in mixing the product with a benzoyl peroxide compound and thereafter effecting a reaction of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Maytag Co. v. Hurley MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gray Tool Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Paul E. Hawkinson Co. v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.