Legal Opinion

Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Miller & England

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1904No. Nos. 48,49PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 614,279, foi a tilting bin, granted to Edwin J. Walker November 15, 1898. On final hearing. .

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBAED, District Judge.*

The patent in suit was considered and sustained in this court in Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Brown and Krause, 110 Fed. 649; and while the defendants, not being par*824ties, are not bound thereby, yet, as was said in Penfield v. Potts, 126 Fed. 475, 61 C. C. A. 371, “a decent respect for the stability of judicial decision and a proper regard for the security of property in the same patent” require that this shall not be disturbed, unless there was very palpable error.

So far as the same references are relied upon to negative novelty, nothing particularly new is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penfield v. C. & A. Potts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Byrd, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Bernard Gloekler Co. v. Walker Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Miller & England v. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API