Legal Opinion

Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Brown

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1901No. 17PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBAED, District Judge.1

If the plaintiffs’ bin is a patentable invention, in view of the prior state of the art, it is conceded that there has been an infringement; and the concession is not a large one, for the bin constructed by the defendants so exactly reproduces its controlling features that one has to look closely to discover any difference between them. It is found in two unimportant particulars, — with regard to the axis of the bin and the display partition; at most mere details of construction, in which, in the matter of simplicity, the defendants may have somewhat improved upon…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Walker Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Miller & EnglandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Miller v. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  4. Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Bernard Gloekler Co. v. Walker Bin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API