Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. Rosoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 23, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages for injuries received in an automobile accident. The jury returned a defendant’s verdict. The plaintiff has appealed. The assignments of error on which he relies are addressed to the finding, to the charge as given, and to the court’s failure to charge as requested.

The following is the gist of the plaintiff’s claims of proof: About 12:20 a. m. on September 29, 1949, the defendant was operating an Oldsmobile southerly on Whitney Avenue in Hamden. The asphalted surface was about forty-four feet wide, from curb to curb. A white double line ran…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Doolittle v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Toth v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Giambartolomei v. Rocky DeCarlo & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Reboni v. Case Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Crowder v. Zion Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Britton v. BouldenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Giambartolomei v. Rocky DeCarlo & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API