Legal Opinion

Doolittle v. Otis Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

In the first assignment of error, the appellant asserts that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a nonsuit. This denial is not a ground of appeal. Bradbury v. South Norwalk, 80 Conn. 298, 299, 68 Atl. 321.

It appears in the judgment-file that the court denied a motion made by the defendant to set aside the verdict in each case, but the grounds of the motion are not indicated, and its denial is not specified as a reason of appeal. If it were, the defendant has not taken the steps necessary to have all the evidence made part of the record, nor in any way laid a foundation for such an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Bradbury v. City of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ludlow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Anderson v. Gengras Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Bullard v. De CordovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Kopischke v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Wofsey v. New York & Stamford Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API