Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Smith

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1979No. 2099 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Louis L. Kaplan (Kaplan), Secretary of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, has filed a petition for review in the nature of an action in mandamus seeking to compel a salary increase to which he is allegedly entitled under Section 441 of The Adminis*97trative Code of 1929 (Code), Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, as amended, 71 P.S. §151. The named respondents, Pañi J. Smith (Smith), Secretary of Labor and Industry, and James Wade (Wade), Secretary of Administration, have filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer which are presently before us for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Valley Forge Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Engel v. Parkway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Styers v. WADECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Palmer v. Penn-Ohio Road Materials, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Keystone Chapter, Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Reiter v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Zafiropoulos v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API