Styers v. WADE
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
We have before ns preliminary objections to two complaints, in mandamus 1 each brought by a Pennsylvania State Police Trooper seeking either promotion to dhe rank of Lieutenant or the convening of a court martial to hear the matter of his alleged demotion. We 'sustain the objections on the single ground that, on the facts as alleged by Plaintiffs, mandamus does not lie.
Following the institution of the new Technical Specialist Program by the State Police, Plaintiffs, in 1969, were reclassified from the rank of Trooper to that of Technical Specialist (TS) and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fatscher v. Board of School DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- O'Peil v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- ROBERTS v. Office of AdministrationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Wyoming Sand & Stone Co. v. Department of RevenueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sever v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- City of Philadelphia v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Philadelphia Firefighters' Union, Local 22 v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Canonsburg General Hospital v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kaplan v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.