Greater Rockford Energy & Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
Antitrust case — 17 Plaintiffs — 11 Defendants — 69 lawyers — and literally a half-ton of pleadings.
First of all, Plaintiffs’ counsel accepted this case with a foreseeable conflict.
But Defendants waited until 3 years into this major antitrust action before moving to disqualify Plaintiffs’ lead counsel (and his firm) on the grounds that Defendants intend to call him as a witness to give testimony that is prejudicial to his clients.
Motion denied.
I. FACTS
Bob Wright is a senior partner for the firm of Domengeaux and Wright, counsel for Plaintiffs. Mr. Wright…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Dr. Ing. Max Schloetter v. Railoc of Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ted JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Eugene MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Jones v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Sanders v. RosenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Sanders v. RosenbergNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993