Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Rosenberg
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1996No. 22871PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
1 We granted Petitioner Michael Rosenberg’s petition for writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the trial court’s disqualification of counsel was an abuse of discretion. We hold the trial court’s discretion to determine the best interest of children is sufficiently broad to support the disqualification of counsel, and, provided there is substantial evidence to support the ruling, it will not be disturbed on appeal. In the instant case, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court’s decision to disqualify…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Dr. Ing. Max Schloetter v. Railoc of Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Keith B. Redd, D/B/A Abajo Petroleum v. Shell Oil Company, in the Matter of Michael W. Graney, Attorney for Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- State v. SimonsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Gould, Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BarnettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Com'n InvestigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Diamond v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Michael A.P. v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.