Legal Opinion

Gaido v. Tysdal

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1951No. 2507PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Justice.

The District Court of Weston County entered a judgment against the defendant Lars Tysdal in an action wherein Severino Gaido was plaintiff and Lars Tysdal and Lloyd Tysdal were defendants. The defendant, Lloyd Tysdal, was by the judgment aforesaid dismissed out of the case and no question arises here in consequence of the court’s ruling on that matter. The judgment against his father, Lars Tysdal, is the one which is attacked by the latter in this direct appeal proceeding.

The alleged facts presented for our consideration may be gathered readily and with reasonable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dugan v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Chittim v. Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Epstein v. WaasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ely v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hollabaugh v. KolbetWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Reed v. WadsworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Oedekoven v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API