Legal Opinion
City of Grand Forks v. Mik-Lan Recreation Ass'n, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1988No. Civ. 870148, 870240PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Justice.
The City of Grand Forks and Richard A. Ohlsen, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, appealed from two orders denying their motions for relief from a default judgment under Rule 60(b), N.D.R. Civ.P. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
In December 1978, owners of condominium units in Liberty Estates Condominium “F” [Liberty Estates] executed a “Declaration and Covenant” [Covenant] which provided for the development and maintenance of a private park for the use of the residents and established a method for private assessments against the owners…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Askew v. Joachim Memorial HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Atwood v. Sault Ste. Marie Light, Heat & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- White House Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Matter of Estate of RisoviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Weimer v. YpparilaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Binek v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. PEOPLES BANK & TR.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992