Atwood v. Sault Ste. Marie Light, Heat & Power Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. . Assumpsit by Frank B. Atwood against the Sault Ste. Marie Light, Heat & Power Company for services rendered. There was judgment by default for plaintiff based on a defective service of the declaration, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This case was commenced by declaration, filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court for Chippewa county. The declaration was in assumpsit, and counted specially upon a contract for personal services performed by John N. Goltra for the defendant corporation for a period of 25 months succeeding the date of the *225contract, alleged to have been made on December 5, 1901, and alleging that there was due and owing said Goltra on account thereof the sum of $1,875. The declaration also averred that on September 11, 1905, said John N. Goltra had duly assigned said claim to the plaintiff in this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- White House Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beck v. Semones' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- People ex rel. Lafferty v. FeickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Societe Nouvelle D'armement v. BarnabyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- King Tonopah Mining Co. v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1916
- Boston Acme Mines Development Co. v. ClawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.