Legal Opinion
Due v. Swartz
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1937No. Civ. 11431PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (Patten & Davies Lbr. Co. v. McConville, 219 Cal. 161, 164 [25 Pac. (2d) 429]), the facts in the instant case are:
June 4, 1936, about 11:30 P. M., plaintiff was riding in her automobile, which was being driven by her chauffeur in a northerly direction on Western Avenue near where it intersects 83rd Street in the City of Los Angeles. At the time *218and for some period prior thereto her automobile was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Maxwell v. Western Auto Stage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Brooks v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Due v. SwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Taylor v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Taylor v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942