Legal Opinion

Due v. Swartz

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1937No. Civ. 11431Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 Cal.App.2d 217 (1937)

ROSE M. DUE, Respondent,

v.

WILLIAM LOUIS SWARTZ, Appellant.

Civ. No. 11431.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

July 30, 1937.

Schell & Delamer for Appellant.

Reginald I. Bauder for Respondent.

McComb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (Patten & Davies Lbr. Co. v. McConville, 219 Cal. 161, 164 [25 PaCal.2d 429]), the facts in the instant case are:

June 4, 1936, about 11:30 P.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Maxwell v. Western Auto Stage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API