Legal Opinion
Mendibles v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1984No. B007409PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
By way of petition for writ of prohibition or mandate, Frank Mendibles has challenged an order which provides for the physical examination of three minor females by a medical expert for the prosecution in a lewd conduct case. We issued alternative writ and order to show cause.
Petitioner is charged with nine counts of forcible lewd conduct with a child under age 14 between October 1981 and January 1983. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b).) The alleged victims are the 3 daughters, ages 10, 12, and 13, of petitioner’s former girlfriend, with whom he was living at the time. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. CoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. SewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WimberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. MendiblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Superior Court of Tulare CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. NokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986