Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court of Tulare County
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 2008No. F054353PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARDAIZ, P. J.
— A defendant in a capital murder case seeks to discover information concerning a vehicle stop and in-field showup made in the vicinity of, and shortly after, the homicide. He further seeks to discover a police report concerning the initial interview of eyewitnesses to the shooting. The witness interview report cannot be located, and the officer who conducted the interview has passed away. Further, the prosecutor repeatedly, but, unbeknown to him, incorrectly, represents that no reports concerning the traffic stop exist. During jury selection, the prosecutor learns that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- J.E. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. VonWahldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. SUPERIOR COURT (MITCHELL)California Court of Appeal · 2010
- IAR Sys. Software, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Pierce, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.