Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Barnett v. Reynolds

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1923No. 5,363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

In this case it appears that the Hardin State Bank, a corporation, executed a bond to secure the deposit with it of certain moneys belonging to the county of Big Horn, made by Harvey H. Barnett, as county treasurer of Big Horn county, Montana. The principal amount of the bond is the sum of $75,000. It was executed by the bank as principal, and *575the several sureties whose names are subscribed thereto, on January 2, 1923, in favor of “Harvey H. Barnett, treasurer of Big Horn county, Montana, his succssors in office, and the state of Montana.” The condition of the bond reads as follows :

“Now,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ancient Order of Hibernians v. SparrowMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Nading v. McGregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Square Butte State Bank v. BallardMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RaugstadMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mieyr v. Federal Surety Co. of DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Muri v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Jenkins v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. American Surety Co. of New YorkMontana Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API