Legal Opinion
Mieyr v. Federal Surety Co. of Davenport
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1933No. 7,074PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
Defendant Federal Surety Company prior to September 25, 1931, was a corporation organized under the laws of Iowa and authorized to do business in Montana. The district court of Scott county, Iowa, in a proceeding brought by the Attorney General of that state, under statutory authority made an order on September 21, 1931, requiring the surety company to appear on September 25 and show cause why its affairs and business should not be dissolved and a receiver appointed to wind up its affairs and distribute its effects as provided by law. The order was served on the surety…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Sturges v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Reynolds v. AddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Davis v. Amra Grotto M. O. v. P. E. R., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
- Mieyr v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- United States ex rel. Colonial Brick Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.