Legal Opinion

State v. Laune

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 2020No. A163483PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

541 Submitted July 30, 2018, affirmed April 15, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DARYL LEE LAUNE, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 16CR55816; A163483

464 P3d 459

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for violating a court’s stalking protective order. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of $330 in court-appointed attorney fees as part his sentence. Specifically, defendant argues that a court may only order a defendant to pay attorney fees when there is evi- dence in the record that the defendant is or may be able to pay them and that,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. Zaldana-MendozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. LauneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API