Legal Opinion

State v. Zaldana-Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 2019No. A160974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

590 Argued and submitted October 27, 2017, reversed and remanded October 2, 2019 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUGO ALEXIS ZALDANA-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court C151359CR; A160974

450 P3d 983

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary, sexual abuse, and unlawful sexual penetration. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s testimony that defendant and the alleged victim had had consensual sex in the days before the charged incident. The trial court excluded that testimony under OEC 412, concluding that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BaughmanOregon Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. LauneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API