Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Meyer

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1982No. 81CA0362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

Defendant, Sophie H. Meyer (the mother) appeals a judgment declaring that she, injured in a one-car accident while a passen*684ger in an automobile owned and driven by defendant Kenneth Meyer (the son), is excluded from bodily injury coverage under the son’s automobile policy with plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (the insurer). We affirm.

This case was tried to the court on an agreed statement of facts and the admissions in the pleadings and in the briefs. There is no dispute as to the son’s legal liability to his mother for her injuries. It is agreed the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CockingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hessling v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Wickland v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Newark Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Western Mutual Insurance Co. v. WannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Federal Way School District No. 210 v. VinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wheeler v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Dotson v. Estate of PearsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API