Legal Opinion

Newark Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 22, 1968No. 21664PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Richard E. Conour. *

This case, in which the parties appear in the same order as in the trial court, stems from another action between two individuals who claimed coverage under liability insurance policies issued by the respective insurers herein. Plaintiff in error, Newark Insurance Company, will hereinafter be referred to as Newark, and defendant in error, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, will be referred to as State Farm. To fully comprehend the issue, it is necessary to recite the facts of the action between the insured individuals to whom the parties are related…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Great American Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Valta Sue Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  5. MacBey v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. John Tenopir v. State Farm Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Schwab v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Elmer F. Wheeler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API