Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 24, 1984No. 82SC155, 82SA474 and 82SA298Published

1Opinion of the Court

689 P.2d 585 (1984)

Sophie H. MEYER and Kenneth Meyer, Petitioners,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a reciprocal or inter-insurance exchange, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Clara AGUIRRE and Porfirio Aguirre, Defendants-Appellants.

Marianne I. ADCOCK and John R. DeCrescentis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 82SC155, 82SA474 and 82SA298.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

September 24, 1984.

Rehearing Denied October 15, 1984.

Bruce A. Matas, Denver, for petitioners in…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API