Legal Opinion

Thomas-Kerr v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 16, 2002No. 49722-7-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Following an arbitration award in an auto accident case, Frederick Brown requested a trial de novo within the 20 days required by statute. The plaintiff, Alva Thomas-Kerr, did not file a similar request. The mandatory arbitration rules provide that “any” aggrieved party may request a trial de novo. Later, Brown withdrew his request, and the court entered judgment on the underlying arbitration award. Thomas-Kerr appeals, arguing that the court should have proceeded with a trial. But she did not preserve her right to a trial de novo as provided in the mandatory arbitration rules. We affirm the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API