Thomas-Kerr v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Following an arbitration award in an auto accident case, Frederick Brown requested a trial de novo within the 20 days required by statute. The plaintiff, Alva Thomas-Kerr, did not file a similar request. The mandatory arbitration rules provide that “any” aggrieved party may request a trial de novo. Later, Brown withdrew his request, and the court entered judgment on the underlying arbitration award. Thomas-Kerr appeals, arguing that the court should have proceeded with a trial. But she did not preserve her right to a trial de novo as provided in the mandatory arbitration rules. We affirm the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WestlingWashington Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Hudson v. HapnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.