Legal Opinion

Gray v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1991No. B053136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

—The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs and respondents Harry J. Gray and Helen Gray (taxpayers), who are Connecticut residents, are entitled to a credit against their 1979 and 1980 California nonresident personal income taxes for taxes which were paid to the State of Connecticut on California-source capital gains. We conclude that taxpayers are entitled to such a credit and affirm.

Facts

Taxpayers and defendant and appellant Franchise Tax Board (Board) stipulated in writing to the following facts:

“1. During the years 1979 and 1980, [taxpayers] were residents of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Yaeger v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Consolidated Accessories Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Burnham v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. MacFarlane v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API