Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1959No. Civ. 23321PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, hereinafter called the “taxpayers,” to recover income taxes paid under protest to the State of California following disallowance by the Franchise Tax Board, hereinafter called the “Board,” of credit for certain Canadian income taxes paid by the taxpayers. The trial court decided the legal issues in accordance with the taxpayers’ contentions and rendered judgment accordingly. The Board brings this appeal.

The facts are stipulated. The returns involved are for the years 1949-1953, inclusive. During these years, the taxpayers were residing and domiciled in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Keyes v. CHAMBERSOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Santa Fe Transportation Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Burgess v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Henley v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Great Western Financial Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Clemens v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API