Legal Opinion

Allured v. Voller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Osceola; McMahon, J. Ejectment by Robert A. Allured against James H. Voller. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This case was once before the court, and is reported in 107 Mich. 476. On the former hearing, the question presented was whether the acceptance of service, accompanied by authority to the plaintiff to proceed as in case of actual service of the writ, conferred jurisdiction upon the circuit court of Osceola county, it appearing that the acceptance was made in another county. It was held that inasmuch as the writing was more than a mere acceptance of service, and contained an authorization to proceed with the case, it gave jurisdiction. On the second trial of the case defendant sought to show…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eureka Iron & Steel Works v. BresnahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Corbitt v. TimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Landon ex rel. Cummins v. CometMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Somers v. LoseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Allured v. VollerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Garey v. Morley BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Clabaugh v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Reason v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API