Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1993No. 6-92-017-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

William Brooks Armstrong was convicted of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for life.

On appeal, Armstrong brings three points of error, two of which contend that his motion for mistrial should have been granted because two jurors wrongfully withheld material information during the voir dire examination. In the remaining point, Armstrong contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of extraneous offenses. We overrule all these points and affirm the judgment.

First, Armstrong argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Halliburton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Decker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  3. Rogers v. Peeler, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Armstrong v. Randle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  5. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API