Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Peeler

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided October 1, 2004No. 06-03-00166-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice ROSS.

Tommy Peeler and Michael S. Rogers were adjoining landowners who had an ongoing boundary line dispute. Rogers shot and severely injured Peeler during a confrontation over Rogers crossing over onto Peeler’s property while riding a four-wheeler. Peeler sued Rogers for this assault, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. 1 The jury returned a verdict awarding Peeler $1,250,000.00 in damages, and the trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict. Rogers appeals, complaining of the trial court’s instruction to the jury limiting his right of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Plante v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Municipal Utility District Ex Rel. Board of Directors, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Gibbins v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. William Olivarez, Jr. v. Jane Doe, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  4. Eichenwald v. RivelloDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. Damacio Sandoval, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API