Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1995No. 540-93Published

1DissentBaird, Judge

Because the majority opinion sanctions both juror and prosecutorial misconduct by condoning the secreting of information necessary to a defendant’s right to a fair trial, I dissent.

I

The pertinent facts are as follows. During voir dire, the trial judge propounded the following question to the venire:

Now, are there any of you who have any — well, I will say are so well acquainted with Mr. Wells [The County Attorney] — I know that most of you know him, he hopes that all of you know him — or with Mr. Ashmore in his office, or Mr. Chuck Super-vine, that’s another assistant, or Mr. Scott McDowell?…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API