Armstrong v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentBaird, Judge
Because the majority opinion sanctions both juror and prosecutorial misconduct by condoning the secreting of information necessary to a defendant’s right to a fair trial, I dissent.
I
The pertinent facts are as follows. During voir dire, the trial judge propounded the following question to the venire:
Now, are there any of you who have any — well, I will say are so well acquainted with Mr. Wells [The County Attorney] — I know that most of you know him, he hopes that all of you know him — or with Mr. Ashmore in his office, or Mr. Chuck Super-vine, that’s another assistant, or Mr. Scott McDowell?…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.