Legal Opinion
Tilo Co. v. Fishman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 20, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant on a promissory note and obtained a judgment. The court’s memorandum of decision was dated July 24, 1970, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff was rendered on August 3, 1970. For some unexplained reason the parties to the action were not notified of the judgment until November 4,1970.
In a petition for a new trial the plaintiff alleged that because of the late notice of the judgment, the time within which an appeal could have been taken had expired. The plaintiff asserted that the delay in notice resulted in the loss of its right to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Lancaster v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Krooner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Bulkley v. Norwich & Westerly Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Mercer v. CosleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Wetzel v. ThorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Clapper v. ClapperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Rizzo v. PackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.