Legal Opinion

Reflow v. Reflow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 1976No. 74085, CA 5158PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The interveners, Seaberts, and the subject children’s father appeal from an order awarding custody of Becky and Butch, now aged 8 and 6, to mother. They have been in the physical custody of the interveners at Aberdeen, Washington for several years pursuant to the marriage-dissolution court’s order. Interveners are sister and brother-in-law of father. Both appellants contend that it is in the children’s best interests that they remain with interveners, and it is additionally contended that there has been no change in circumstances since the court’s previous order justifying a change in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Quinn v. HanksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Shrout v. ShroutOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dugger v. LaulessOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Smith v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Petition of DISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. C.R.S. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of Hruby and HrubyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Matter of Baby Girl DSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department of Marion County v. G. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API